Thursday, March 5, 2009

Who teaches Palestinian children to hate?

If one were to peruse the Palestinian Media Watch website, one would get the impression that there is no worse place on earth than Palestine for a child to grow up in. Not because the site reveals anything about the dispossession or impoverishment of the population or Israeli attacks on "terrorists" that kill children in the process. No, Palestine is a terrible place for children because there is no corner of youth life that is free from the cult of hatred and terrorism: it infects music videos, cartoons, even children's books. All this is scrupulously documented on the website.

Such is the influence of this media watchdog, that its director Itamar Marcus (an Israeli) presented a report in 2007 to the U.S. Senate on the dangerous ideology of Palestinian textbooks (non-acceptance of the existence of the Israeli State, Holocaust denial, criticism of America). In 2003, he talked at a Senate hearing about media clips and summer camps directed at Palestinian children that extolled the greatness of martyrdom. Here is an excerpt featuring two prominent American senators as well as a Palestinian representative (emphasis is mine):

Sen. Arlen Specter: “This hearing has been scheduled as promptly as we could, because of our views that these films ought to be known by the people of the United States. ...The characterization at the end [of the film] about [the PA as] child abusers is a vast understatement. They’re civilization abusers. The children are their means to destroy civilization.”

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton: “With the testimony and the documentary evidence concerning the glorification of suicide killers and the incitement of young people to aspire to that position, will the Palestinian Authority direct the PATV to remove any reference to martyrdom, Shahada and the glorification of suicide bombers from the television?”

Hassan Abdel Rahman: “I understand that you want to focus on this issue, but I personally, honestly, cannot separate this from the wider context.”


Let me first of all say that I am not denying the glorification of violence and extreme anti-Israeli sentiment to be found in Palestine. It certainly exists, it is frightening, and it is detrimental to the peace process. What troubles me with this site is that Palestinians are being presented to American (and other Anglophone) audiences as hateful enemies of "civilization" without 1.) any positive counter-images, and 2.) any context provided for the virulence of Palestinian anger against Israelis.

The way that historical context is passed over can also be seen in the mission statement of Teach Kids Peace (which is sponsored by so-called HonestReporting.com, a site that attacks anti-Israeli biases in the media):

"As terrorism stands at the center of world challenges for the 21st century, Teach Kids Peace maintains that reforming education is the most important and often most ignored key to eliminating terror. Terrorists are not born, they're taught. September 11 and other attacks were only possible through years of indoctrination in schools, media, and mosques. Hateful teachings produce hateful actions. Stopping incitement is the only way to stop terror."

It's an interesting proposition. I believe there is truth in the statement that "Terrorists are not born, they're taught," but I also believe that it ignores the importance of personal experience in developing hateful ideologies and a willingness to commit suicide missions for a cause. If these personal grievances did not exist, there would be nothing for these "inciters" to play off of. If large proportions of Palestinians had not undergone the experience of being kicked out of their homes, of being deprived of their ancestral homeland, of living in poverty with limited educational and professional opportunities, of being humiliated at hundreds of check points, of losing friends and relatives in attacks by the Israeli military, of having the little land allowed them invaded by illegal Israeli settlers...Yes, we could try to censor spiteful and violent rhetoric, but will that also suppress the deep-rooted frustration that fuels this rhetoric? In my opinion, stopping incitement is merely one step in stopping terror. It will have no long-term effect if you do nothing to correct the broader political and socioeconomic problems that are breeding this conflict in the first place. It is easier to blame Palestinian violence on hate-mongers, but the Israeli government has to accept some responsibility for this so-called "culture of hate and death".

Maybe this is cynical of me, but I can't help but wonder if this is entirely about Western grown-ups being concerned for the welfare of Palestinian children. Intentional or not, there is an underlying political message here. A dichotomy has been set up between Palestinians as the monopolists of hate/violence/barbarism and Israelis as representatives of peace/civilization. Not only could this dichotomy be construed as racist, but it sidelines a long history of generalized anti-Palestinian violence and rhetoric by Israelis. By portraying the Palestinian Authority as a supporter of extremism and terrorism in media/educational resources, and by ignoring the historical and current causes of Palestinian frustration, these sites can effectively delegitimize the Palestinian cause in the eyes of American and other audiences.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with your general post about the total lack of media perspective towards Palestine. By demonizing these people, it is illegitimating their social power. It is sad to note that even our new Secretary of State condemns Palestine blatantly. It makes one wonder how things will turn out given the most recent trip Middle Eastern trip she just came back from. The monopolizing power for pro-Israel in the US media must influence her quite a bit. Perhaps she does not have access to the personal experience that you are talking about, thus her views of what values the Palestinian people hold are skewed.

    I want to press you to think about where is this cut off line of hatred and violence on TV and general mass mood. Also, what are effective ways to counter hate on both sides by the media they put out? Why is Israeli media reach a better audience than that of the Palestinians?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not sure I entirely understand your questions. What I will say is that I wish that both Palestinian and Israeli media would broadcast more stories like the film and news clip I posted yesterday about the West Bank security wall. These stories do not dwell on violent, hateful images. They show real Palestinians experiencing real hardships, who nevertheless do not want to become "freedom fighters" or have their sons become "freedom fighters". I think it would be really helpful if there were more media exposure of Palestinian peace groups, Israeli activists opposed to the security wall, etc., to cut through stereotypes.

    I'm not sure what you mean by the last question. I don't imagine that violent media agitation would resonate so well with Israeli audiences, if that's what you're asking. I think that Israel has a culture of fear just like Palestine, but living conditions there are much better, there are guards everywhere, their land and property has not been stolen from them, so Israelis probably don't experience the same level of desperation and personal oppression as the Palestinians. Furthermore, in Israel there's no need to cultivate home-grown terrorists willing to commit suicide missions. All you need to do is instill enough nationalist pride that people are willing to serve their time somewhere in the armed forces. Palestinians on the other hand have no formal army to defend them and very few weapons aside from rocks. Media agitation provides an extra push to fight in such a high-risk environment, even to make the "ultimate sacrifice".

    There is a corresponding "Israel Media Watch" site, by the way, but it seems woefully devoid of critical reporting about hate speech in the Israeli media.

    ReplyDelete